Skip to main content

Teams

Chris Kreider Left Four Million Dollars Behind

FanPoolHQ ·

Chris Kreider Left Four Million Dollars Behind

What this is built on. Reported contract terms from this past week, my own contract database for the deals that came before them, and NHL season statistics for what the players actually did. Draft positions come from a Drafters board pulled 13 September 2026 and are used only to show where the market has these players. Nothing here depends on them.

On Wednesday the Anaheim Ducks put Chris Kreider on unconditional waivers. Nobody claimed him. On Thursday they terminated his contract by mutual consent, wiping the last year of a seven-year deal at $6.5 million off their books. On Saturday he signed in Montreal for one year at $2.15 million guaranteed, with another $3.25 million available in bonuses he now has to go out and earn.

Stripped down, the transaction is a thirty-five-year-old agreeing to walk away from roughly four million guaranteed dollars so that his former employer could afford to pay a twenty-two-year-old.

That is not a criticism of anyone involved. Kreider wanted to get back to the Eastern Conference, closer to home, and Anaheim needed the room badly enough to ask. Both sides got what they wanted. The exchange rate matters because the same one turned up three more times this week.

Why Anaheim needed the room

Cutter Gauthier scored 41 goals in 76 games last season, in his second full year, at seventeen minutes a night. He is a restricted free agent. He is also unsigned, and reportedly not close.

The number that broke the negotiation is not Gauthier's. It is Leo Carlsson's. Anaheim matched a five-year offer at $18 million a season to keep their franchise centre, and having established that price inside their own dressing room, they could hardly turn to a 41-goal winger and plead poverty. Gauthier's side is reported to have moved into the $15–16 million range. Anaheim, after the July spending, had something like $9 million to work with.

Removing Kreider's $6.5 million takes them past $15.5 million. The termination was not a hockey decision. It was the cost of the conversation happening in the other room.

What each player did last season makes the arithmetic uncomfortable rather than obvious:

ageGPGpointsice time
Cutter Gauthier2276416917:15
Chris Kreider3575225017:03

Gauthier is better, and he is thirteen years younger, and he is going to be paid accordingly. None of that makes Kreider's fifty points disappear.

What the board thinks of a fifty-point winger

I have pulled the Drafters ADP board four times since the end of August. Chris Kreider has been unranked on all four: not ranked late, not ranked at all. The only thing that changed between the 8 September pull and the 13 September pull is his team abbreviation, which flipped from ANH to MON. The board learned he had moved. It did not adjust his price, because it had never given him one.

That is defensible on its own. It is less defensible in company. Of the 175 ranked skaters I can match to a full season of statistics, 54 of them scored fewer points last season than the unranked Kreider did. Widen it out and the pattern goes well beyond one player:

ranked skatersunranked skaters with 40+ points
how many17551
mean age28.630.5

Fifty-one skaters who scored at least forty points are not on the board at all, and they are on average two years older than the ones who are. The names at the top of that list are not marginal: Anthony Mantha at 64 points, Ivan Barbashev at 61, Tyler Bertuzzi and Charlie Coyle at 58, Jordan Eberle and Alexander Wennberg at 55.

There is a real argument on the other side. A best-ball board is buying upside, not last season, and a thirty-two-year-old winger's best remaining season is probably the one he just had, while a nineteen-year-old's is somewhere in front of him. That is why Anton Frondell goes at 141.7 on nine points in twelve games and Porter Martone at 92.3 on ten in nine. Those are lottery tickets, knowingly bought.

The argument only breaks when the format changes. If you are managing a cap, a roster and a season of real games (the league most people actually play in), then a thirty-one-year-old at 0.73 points a game on an expiring deal is not a worse asset than a teenager who may or may not play. He is a different asset, priced at nothing by a board built for someone else's rules.

The rest of the week's signings

Kreider was not the only contract that got done, and the three that did tell the same story from three different angles.

Zachary Bolduc, Montreal, four years, $4.2 million a season. Signed hours before camp opened. Bolduc is 23. He came to Montreal from St. Louis in the Logan Mailloux swap in July 2025, put up 30 points in 78 games in his first season there and seven more in nineteen playoff games as the Canadiens went to the Eastern Conference Final. His previous deal paid him $1,337,500. This one pays him 3.1 times that, and takes him to unrestricted free agency at 27.

The interesting number in his file is 13:38, his average ice time last season. That is a fourth of the roster's minutes going to a player Montreal just committed sixteen million dollars to. They are not paying for what he did at 13:38. They are paying to not have this conversation in two years, when he is playing seventeen minutes and the price has moved.

Mark Stone, Vegas, two years, $9 million a season. The captain took a small cut from his $9.5 million to stay through 2028-29. He is 34, he scored 73 points in 60 games last season, and his ice time has not moved in three years. Two years, at a discount, from a player still producing at nearly a point and a quarter a game.

Side by side:

agetermcap hitdirection
Zachary Bolduc234 years$4.2Mup 3.1×
Mark Stone342 years$9.0Mdown from $9.5M
Chris Kreider351 year$2.15Mdown from $6.5M

Term goes down as age goes up, which is unsurprising. The direction of the money flips at the same time. The young player got a raise he has not yet earned on the ice. Both veterans, one of whom scored 73 points, took less than they were getting.

Who still has to sign, and why Tuesday matters

Under all of this sits a deadline: Tuesday, 15 September.

It is the last day a player can re-sign with his current team for eight years. From Wednesday the new CBA takes over and the maximum drops to seven years for re-signings, and to six for a player signing with a new club. Every extension still outstanding is being negotiated against that clock, which is why so much got done this past week.

Five names matter, and three of them are being drafted right now by people who may not have noticed they are unsigned:

teamADPlast season
Cutter GauthierAnaheim29.741 G, 69 pts
Adam FantilliColumbus93.124 G, 59 pts
Drake BathersonOttawa114.733 G, 71 pts
Alexander NikishinCarolina16533 pts, 18:11
Simon EdvinssonDetroitunranked25 pts, 22:21

Gauthier is the thirtieth player off the board in a typical draft and has no contract. Fantilli is reported to be looking at the Carlsson and Bedard numbers ($18 million and $15 million) against a Columbus team with roughly $12.65 million in space. That is not a gap you close with a phone call. Batherson wants eight years, which means he wants it signed by Tuesday, with Adrian Kempe at $10.625 million and Alex Tuch at $10.5 million cited as the comparables. Nikishin is asking around $8 million off his entry-level deal and cannot be offer-sheeted. Edvinsson played 22:21 a night for Detroit, more than anyone else on this list, and is unranked on the board entirely.

Most of these get done. They almost always do. But "almost always" is doing real work in that sentence, and if you are drafting this week, Gauthier at 29.7 is a top-thirty pick on a player who has not agreed to play.

The short version

Anaheim terminated a thirty-five-year-old's contract to afford a twenty-two-year-old, and the thirty-five-year-old agreed to it. Montreal picked him up for a third of the price and gave a twenty-three-year-old a 3.1× raise on the same weekend. Vegas kept its captain by paying him less. Every one of those is a rational decision, and taken together they price experience at a discount that would have looked absurd five years ago.

The draft board has already gone further than the teams have. It does not price Kreider's fifty points at a discount; it does not price them at all, and the same goes for fifty other skaters who scored forty or more, whose only shared trait is that they are, on average, two years older than the players being drafted ahead of them.

If your league is a best-ball board, that is a coherent position. If your league has a cap, a roster and eighty-two games in it, there are fifty-one names sitting there that nobody at your table is going to call.

Where the numbers come from. Contract terms signed this week are as publicly reported at the time of writing; Kreider's bonus structure in particular has been reported at slightly different figures by different outlets, and the $3.25 million here is the figure given by NHL.com and TSN. Prior contract terms and expiry dates come from my own contract database, sourced from CapWages and last synchronised 27 July 2026, which is why it still lists Kreider in Anaheim at $6.5 million. Season statistics (games, goals, points, average ice time) come from the NHL's public player API, with mid-season trades combined into one line. Ages are as of 1 October 2026. Draft positions come from a Drafters board pulled 13 September 2026. Board rows are matched to statistics by name and rejected when the position disagrees, because two different NHL players are named Sebastian Aho and only one of them is a defenceman.

← All articles